Re: [nbos] Atmospheres...Was: Fine control on random system generation?
Daniel Williamson
Tue Jan 30th, 2007
My wife is an anesthesiologist and I ask her these kinds of questions all the time. It really aggravates her, a little knowledge is really a dangerous thing. If you are really brave try medical web sites. Otherwise, my rule of thumb is that anything less than .5 ATM is too thin, Oygen percentage needs to be .15-.25, adjusted UP if the ATM pressure is lower. Anything higher would be considered a Corrosive atmosphere, and a fire risk as well. Traveller does not concentrate on simply chemical content of the atmosphere, an atmosphere could be toxic or corrosive due to organic compounds, molds, viruses or anything else. The game effect is what is important here.

Dan.


___________________________________________________
"Umm..."


----- Original Message ----
From: "Dutton, Dennis L" <dennis.l.dutton-at-boeing.com>
To: nbossoftware-at-nbos.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 7:29:16 AM
Subject: [nbos] Atmospheres...Was: Fine control on random system generation?


Thanks, that was what I was looking for. Now, on another subject...

In Traveller there are various different types of atmospheres (toxic,
corrosive, polluted, etc.) at various different pressures (thin, normal,
dense, etc.). The pressures I can deal with as Traveller is very
specific. As to the content, AS has specific chemical contents. Do you
know where I can find a discussion on how the chemical contents effect
humans...What chemicals are toxic? How much O2 is required for an
atmosphere to be breathable? What chemicals are corrosive and how much
can be in the air before it becomes noticeable? Etc.

Cheers, Dennis
Game Master, Morning Garden
Play-by-Email Campaign
mailto:duttond-at-duttond.topcities.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: NBOS Support [mailto:support2-at-nbos.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:07 AM
> To: nbossoftware-at-nbos.com
> Subject: Re: [nbos] [AS] Fine control on random system generation?
>
> At 02:32 PM 1/29/2007, you wrote:
> >I think Ed defined habitable as a planet with any one or
> two of suitable >gravity, temperature, atmosphere and maybe
> water. While hospitable required >all of them. If you can
> search the logs its here somplace.
>
> Yep, thats essentially it:
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nbossoftware mailing list





____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
_______________________________________________
Nbossoftware mailing list


Copyright © 2003-2007, NBOS Software. All rights reserved. 'Fractal Mapper', 'ScreenMonkey', 'Character Sketcher', 'Inspiration Pad', 'Fractal World Explorer', 'Goblin API', 'AstroSynthesis' are trademarks of NBOS Software. 'Dwarven Beserker' art by V. Shane.
Member contributed resources