Re: [nbos] [AS] Multiple Star System QuestionFixer Thu Jun 26th, 2008
----- Original Message ----
From: "nbossoftware-request-at-nbos.com" <nbossoftware-request-at-nbos.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:15:28 AM
Subject: Nbossoftware Digest, Vol 46, Issue 7
Send Nbossoftware mailing list submissions to
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
You can reach the person managing the list at
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Nbossoftware digest..."
1. Re: [AS] Multiple Star System Question (T'Star)
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:36:12 -0500
From: T'Star <bedlamandmayhem-at-gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nbos] [AS] Multiple Star System Question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
A fair point, but honestly I like Dave's idea. What I'm building is in no way realistic, but it makes for fun gameplay!
Thanks for all the good feedback, nice to meet such a troll-free list!
[anyone wanna take a stab at a plugin for this option?]
-For me on realism. It depends on what I'm doing. AS doesn't push
suspension of disbelief anymore than most science fiction novels do,
so I see no issues with the orbits calculated as is. I'm also a
consistency fiend. When my players say "Well that's not very
realistic" it's becuase something in my internal consistency is off.
Though they're more likely to assume that anything 'off' is part of a
plot device. But even a fantasy world has rules of what is and isn't
possible... and has perceptions of what is and isn't possible. And
it's the difference between the two that frequently allows you to
surprise your players.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:38 AM, David Loman <dloman77-at-gmail.com> wrote:
> What if, for simplicity's sake, AS2 was coded to not take gravity wells from
> other 'systems' into account? In the example of a multiple star system, the
> 'dead zone' where all the stars orbit around is calculated and then the
> stars are set in motion. From there, AS2 simple calculated the orbit of any
> given star's children based solely on the stars current position and no
> other factors. The orbit of these children would end up looking like a
> spiral graph, but hey, at least its calculable.
> And no, it won't conform to 'actual astrophysics' but hey, this is primarily
> a RPG/fantasy game tool, is it not? One of my pet peeves is when a player
> of a fantasy RPG utters the statement, "well thats not very realistic." My
> retort as GM is usually a very unprofessional "well duh!!!"
> -Dave L
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:52 AM, NBOS Support <support2-at-nbos.com> wrote:
>>> Okay Ed, step in here, did I get that right? :))
>> Pretty much :-)
>> Displaying the orbits on screen isnt much of a problem given the orbital
>> properties (and ignoring the gravity of planets). It's calculating those
>> orbital properties in the first place that is something I dont know is even
>> possible. You can test if a system is stable, but creating the stable
>> system may not even be possible for all arrangements. For binary systems,
>> they can orbit a center point. But for more than two stars, there's no
>> guarantee that a stable orbit can be even calculated.
>> For AS2 I thought about just setting it up so that stars get evenly
>> placed, and are treated as standing still. But thats obviously not very
>> realistic. So I decided to hold off on dealing with it (and, similarly,
>> planet systems) until I could get a better handle on the physics involved.
>> Nbossoftware mailing list
> Nbossoftware mailing list
Nbossoftware mailing list
End of Nbossoftware Digest, Vol 46, Issue 7
Nbossoftware mailing list